Things changed when I took lessons. Stuff sung from memory now became more complex. Scores revealed sustained notes I’d chopped short, small runs I’d ignored, consonants I’d blurred.
Take All Through the Night (Welsh trad.), first sung at primary school. Under V’s guidance, I discovered the third line:
Soft, the drowsy hours are creeping
went higher than I expected and I had, in effect, to re-learn the song. Later, with more advanced songs, I made recurring faults: I sounded notes that seemed logical as part of a sequence but were nevertheless incorrect. The correct notes weren’t as high (or low) as my half-trained instincts suggested. One reason why much classical music is beyond the competence of amateurs who depend on memory alone.
Here’s the point. Many may recognise – even sympathise with – my earlier amateur tendency to burst into song. Singing can often be an expression of happiness. But, such sympathisers might ask, doesn’t some of the joy disappear in a welter of niggling detail?
Quite simply, the joy continues but it becomes better focused. Lessons increase one’s alertness to less obvious melodies which depend on small variations in pitch, typically half-tones. These are harder to learn than – say - hymns written for untrained congregations. But when these subtle variations finally stick, ah! the satisfaction.
Alas, it’s not me. It’s German baritone, Olaf Bär, now 61,then at his pomp. Listen out for groups of repeated notes. How does monotony become great beauty? |
Liked the Hugo Wolf! Are you going to share more of RR in concert?
ReplyDeleteI suppose there are many examples. Are you a fan of music with more strongly repetitive structures? As, Glass, Reich, etc.?
And certainly it appears in written form as well. Ecclesiastes 3 conveys something of monotony with its repetitions in language (and patterns of opposites and seasons, etc.), and yet it is pleasing and a famous passage...
Marly: No more contemporaneous sharing of my progress. I've done that in the past and it's always been too soon. There are songs I "thought" I had learned a couple years ago and foolishly posted the recordings at that time. Only now - when V unexpectedly delves back into my repertoire - can the pair of us accurately measure the quality (or lack of it) in what I have achieved. It's asking a lot for people who read Tone Deaf and admit to not knowing anything about music to judge what can only be regarded as work-in-progress.
ReplyDeleteI have posted intermittently about the "moderns", possibly before you came aboard. Elliot Carter's harpsichord concerto got the thumbs up as did more recent operas by Turnage and Benjamin. Where singing is involved I am full of admiration for professionals who can embark on work which seems unrelated to conventional thinking about pitch and tempo, and turn it into music. But since work written four-hundred years ago can still test me to the limit, I don't feel the need as yet to move into the twenty-first century.
Michael Head's setting of The Lord's Prayer, which I learned two years ago and which pleased V when - at her request - I sang it a few weeks ago, was written in the early twentieth century. However V's pleasure was mainly to do with technical matters, notably the way my voice is now able to cope with the full-wellie, high pitch finale.
I have also posted (enthusiastically) about Ecclesiastes quite recently Those words were read out at last-day-of-term services at my secondary school. They embedded themself in my appreciation decades before I swapped my antipathy towards poetry and started - uncertainly - to write sonnets. And yes, they are an exultant tribute to the possibilities of repetition. Especially "or":
Or ever the silver cord be loosed, or the golden bowl be broken, or the pitcher be broken at the fountain, or the wheel broken at the cistern. Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was: and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it.
Great poetry doesn't always lend itself to musical settings (Although I make exception with another song V taught me - O Mistress Mine - assuming that qualifies as great poetry). This is mainly due to the need for precise articulation which may often play second fiddle to the needs of the melody. The Richard Strauss of Four Last Songs - masterly long lines for the soprano - would be a natural for Ecclesiastes I think. I wrote a sonnet about his funeral.
Oh how I do go on.